65 reader checks this week

Cork Woman Sues Over Alleged Retinal Detachment Delay

| By Legal News Team | Updated
Cork Woman Sues Over Alleged Retinal Detachment Delay

The High Court in Dublin is currently hearing a significant medical negligence claim brought by a Cork woman who alleges that a delay in diagnosing a retinal detachment has left her with permanent and debilitating visual impairments. Lisa Hayes, a forty-nine-year-old mother of three from Togher in Cork, has initiated legal proceedings against her family general practitioner, an out-of-hours medical service, and a duty doctor. The core of her action centres on the assertion that a failure to promptly identify and treat her deteriorating eye condition resulted in a delayed surgical intervention, ultimately causing irreversible distortion to the vision in her left eye. Medical negligence cases of this nature highlight the critical importance of timely diagnosis in emergency ocular conditions, where the window for preserving sight is notoriously narrow.

Alleged Timeline of Medical Events

The court heard that the events leading to the legal action commenced on the fifth of May, 2022. According to the proceedings, Ms Hayes awoke that morning experiencing a deeply concerning constellation of symptoms. These reportedly included drooping of her left eye and lip, a severe left-sided headache, and noticeable swelling affecting both her eye and throat on the left side. Crucially, she also noted a small shadow in her left eye, although it is claimed that this specific symptom had a negligible effect on her overall vision at that precise moment. Recognising the potential severity of her condition, the plaintiff telephoned the surgery of her family practitioner, Dr Brendan O'Regan, seeking an urgent consultation either over the telephone or in person. The court was informed that she was advised her call would be returned later that day, setting in motion a chain of events that her legal team argues constituted a critical delay in appropriate medical intervention.

Profound Impact on Daily Life

The consequences of the alleged delayed diagnosis have been profoundly life-altering for the Cork mother, illustrating the severe personal toll that sensory loss can inflict. Ms Hayes claims that the distorted vision in her left eye has severely curtailed her independence and her ability to manage everyday tasks. She has informed the court that she now experiences significant difficulty performing a variety of standard household chores, which previously formed a routine part of her daily life. Furthermore, the visual impairment has meant she is no longer able to drive, a restriction that heavily impacts her mobility and personal freedom. Even routine activities such as grocery shopping have become fraught with difficulty, as she reportedly struggles to accurately identify products and read price tags. In Irish personal injury law, such profound disruptions to daily living and loss of amenity are central to the assessment of general damages, should liability be established by the court.

The Defendants and Legal Proceedings

The legal action is being taken against three distinct parties involved in the plaintiff's care during the critical period. Ms Hayes has sued Dr Brendan O'Regan, her family general practitioner based in Donnybrook, Douglas, Cork. She has also brought proceedings against SouthDoc Services Limited, the well-known out-of-hours medical service operating in Cork city and the broader Munster region, which has its registered offices on High Street in Killarney, County Kerry. The third defendant is Dr Mehboob Kukaswadia, a medical practitioner based at St Mary's Health Campus on Baker Road in Gurranabraher, who was the duty doctor acting for SouthDoc at the time of the alleged incident. All three defendants have fully denied the claims brought against them. The plaintiff is represented by a robust legal team, including senior counsel Dr John White and Cian O'Mahony, instructed by Cork-based solicitor Denis O'Sullivan, as they navigate the complexities of the High Court system.

Medical Negligence and Duty of Care in Ireland

This case underscores the intricate nature of medical negligence litigation within the Irish legal framework. Unlike standard personal injury claims, such as road traffic accidents or workplace incidents which must first be assessed by the Injuries Resolution Board, allegations of medical negligence bypass this statutory body and proceed directly to the courts. To succeed in such a claim before the High Court, a plaintiff must establish on the balance of probabilities that the medical professionals breached their duty of care. In Ireland, this is typically assessed against the well-established Dunne principles, which examine whether a medical practitioner was guilty of such failure that no other practitioner of equal specialist or general status would be guilty of if acting with ordinary care. Furthermore, the plaintiff must prove that this specific breach directly caused the injury complained of. In cases involving retinal detachment, establishing causation often involves complex expert medical testimony regarding how much vision could have been salvaged had surgical intervention occurred earlier. The outcome of this case will likely turn on detailed expert evidence examining the exact timeline of symptom presentation, the triage protocols employed by the medical practices, and the standard of care expected when a patient presents with sudden neurological and ocular symptoms.

Free Claim Assessment

Find out if you have a valid claim — free, no obligation.

Start Free Assessment